Textbooks on international law, dicta of the International Court of Justice and the International Law Commissions Guiding Principles applicable to unilateral declarations of states capable of creating legal obligations of 2006, all reflect the fact that in international law a states unilateral declaration can create a legally binding obligation. Unilateral declarations are common, as a look at the weekly headlines of any major newspaper will reveal. Many of the declarations made at the highest level are, of course, vaguely expressed and carry no tangible legal commitment. But others deliver a very clear message: for instance the USs April 2010 declaration on its future use of nuclear weapons or Kosovos declaration of independence and pledge to follow the Ahtisaari Plan, are two recent and prominent examples of unilateral declarations at the international level.
The same sources, however, also reveal that while state promises are accepted as a means for states to create full blown legal commitments, the law governing such declarations is far from clear. This monograph fills a gap in international legal scholarship by raising and answering the question of the precise legal value of such pledges in the realm of public international law.
After a brief introduction state promises in international law are defined and contrasted with other unilateral acts of states, and the history of promises in state practice and court decisions is delineated, together with scholarly opinion.
The book then provides a detailed picture of the international legal framework governing promises of states, and ends with a brief assessment of the raison d tre for promises as a binding mechanism in international law, along with their advantages and disadvantages in comparison with the classical mechanism for assuming international obligations - the international treaty.
This is currently the only book to present a comprehensive overview of the legal effect of promises by states in international law.